The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal gaming.

No, they weren't personally in presence, but the world-famous celebs were conspicuously included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the questionable websites providing both free casino-style games and profitable rewards, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of lots of gaming corporations, not to point out suit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments function as conventional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the high 24-percent federal sports betting levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income last year alone. Now the company deals with accusations of prohibited gambling in a New york city claim that declares VGW utilizes star endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm unsure" if you do not trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebrities from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any differences between traditional sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where many - however not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has an offer with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he routinely touts on social networks

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements usually focus around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for actual gambling losses.

Others tempt clients with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad displaying Drake's cars, airplanes and estates before rotating to footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never gave up.'

The discrepancy in between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.

A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, many of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for free.

'Most social sweeps clients never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming websites.'

Social gambling establishments provide customers an opportunity to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the alternative to purchase valueless currency frequently described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine money, however can be used to unlock various functions within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, permitting consumers to get other currency known as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's cars and trucks, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all however 7 states, which has actually helped to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need generally require identification. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow consumers to send mail-in requests for totally free sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully specific guidelines. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, thus giving them a reason to attempt their hands at any variety of casino video games for a chance to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes sites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the complimentary casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a means of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are just a type of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to play at social casinos with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever have to spend for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is an important difference in between social sweeps and standard online sports betting sites like gambling establishments.'

Think about the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that provide them the opportunity to win lucrative prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself does not meet the definition of gambling in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all kinds of daily services in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are regularly used by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of gambling market experts, that argument does not cut it.

For starters, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thus recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote genuine items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last forever and they're generally not tied to casino-style games of chance,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're simply cash giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the characteristics frequently connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes casinos provide" casino-like" payouts, typically 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the typical payout percentage for a short-term marketing sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the profits made by the business [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the internet coffee shops that emerged in Florida, using customers the possibility to play casino-style games for genuine rewards. A lot of those brick-and-mortar facilities have given that been shuttered over allegations of illegal gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst several celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos must deal with similar analysis.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have repeatedly been mentioned by courts and state attorney general of the United States as essential consider determining that a sweepstakes promotion remained in reality a guise for prohibited gambling.'

One of the gambling establishment industry's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are forgoing significant tax and profits chances as this sports betting replaces that conducted through regulated channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have actually sued social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without admitting any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW concurred to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current claim, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'illegal sports betting enterprise. '

Apple and Google have likewise been named as defendants in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's request for comment.

'We typically don't talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com through email. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we operate, and stay confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of North America, as we have for more than a decade, developing not only terrific games, user experiences and entertainment, however also ensuring this is done safely, responsibly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively common across the online social games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we intend to strongly protect any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The problems in between conventional online sports betting and sweepstakes casinos might prove bothersome for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with traditional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting wagering 'sweeps' sites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong position versus unlawful gambling - especially when attempting to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably prohibited gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a duty to explain to clients the distinctions and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our business practices more broadly,' the representative stated. 'Some of our values are" our gamers precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady prohibited gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is also some threat that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with unlawful sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton